09-02-053

MLV.

53

The following table shows the estimated number of speakers of Mlv in the area in which it is a vernacular:-

Indore Agency...
 
 
183,750
Eastern Mlv-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Kota...
80,978
  Tonk (Chabra)...
20,000
  Gwalior Agency...
395,000
 
--------
 
  495,978
  Bhopal Agency...
 1,800,000
  Bhopawar Agency...
 
 
147,000
  Western Malwa Agency...
1,241,500
 
  
  Tonk (Nimbahera)...
4,000
 
 
 
--------
1,245,500
 
Swr-
 
 
 
  Western Malwa...
115,000
 
 
  Jhalawar (Chaumahla)...
86,556
 
 
  Bhopal...
2,000
 
 
 
--------
  203,556
  
 
 
 
1,449,056
Broken Mlv of the Central Provinces-
 
 
 
  Hoshangabad...
126,523
 
 
  Betul...
119,000
 
 
  Bhyar of Chhindwara...
11,000
 
 
  Kaiy of Chhindwara...
18,000
 
 
  Pav of Chanda...
200
 
 
 
--------
 
  274,723
 
 
TOTAL =
 4,350,507

  No figures are available to show the number of speakers of Mlv in other parts of India. It is true that from a few districts some speakers of Rg are reported, but to give the number of these would only be misleading. No doubt many persons who were returned as speaking Mrw really spoke Mlv. As the main dialect of Central India, Mlv has exercised considerable influence on the Dakhin Hindstn of Hyderabad and Madras.

 I do not know of any previous account of the Mlv dialect, or of any literary works written in it.

 The Dva-ngar character, usually in a corrupt form closely allied to that used for Mrw, is employed for writing allv.

 As Mwt represents Rjasthn merging into Braj Bhkh and Panjb, so Mlv represents Rjasthn merging into Bundl and Gujart. We may take the language of the Indore Agency of Central India as the standard form of the dialect, and the specimens given, on which the grammatical sketch which follows is based, come from the Junior Branch of the Dewas State in that area.

 As stated above, Mlv, in the Malwa country, has two forms, viz.:-Rg (properly spelt Rg) or Rj-w, spoken by Rajputs, and Mlv (properly spelt Mlv), sometimes called Ahr, spoken by the rest of the population. There is not much difference between these two forms of speech. When they do differ, Rg shows a tendency to agree with the dialects of central Rajputana, Mrw (under the form of Mw) and Jaipur.