09-02-053
MLV.
53
The following table shows the estimated number of speakers of Mlv in the area in which it is a vernacular:-
Indore Agency... |
|
|
183,750
|
Eastern Mlv- |
|
|
|
Kota... |
80,978
|
||
Tonk (Chabra)... |
20,000
|
||
Gwalior Agency... |
395,000
|
||
--------
|
|
495,978
|
|
Bhopal Agency... |
1,800,000
|
||
Bhopawar Agency... |
|
|
147,000
|
Western Malwa Agency... |
1,241,500
|
|
|
Tonk (Nimbahera)... |
4,000
|
|
|
--------
|
1,245,500
|
|
|
Swr- |
|
|
|
Western Malwa... |
115,000
|
|
|
Jhalawar (Chaumahla)... |
86,556
|
|
|
Bhopal... |
2,000
|
|
|
--------
|
203,556
|
|
|
|
|
1,449,056
|
|
Broken Mlv of the Central Provinces- |
|
|
|
Hoshangabad... |
126,523
|
|
|
Betul... |
119,000
|
|
|
Bhyar of Chhindwara... |
11,000
|
|
|
Kaiy of Chhindwara... |
18,000
|
|
|
Pav of Chanda... |
200
|
|
|
--------
|
|
274,723
|
|
|
TOTAL =
|
4,350,507
|
No figures are available to show the number of speakers of Mlv in other parts of India. It is true that from a few districts some speakers of Rg are reported, but to give the number of these would only be misleading. No doubt many persons who were returned as speaking Mrw really spoke Mlv. As the main dialect of Central India, Mlv has exercised considerable influence on the Dakhin Hindstn of Hyderabad and Madras.
I do not know of any previous account of the Mlv dialect, or of any literary works written in it.
The Dva-ngar character, usually in a corrupt form closely allied to that used for Mrw, is employed for writing allv.
As Mwt represents Rjasthn merging into Braj Bhkh and Panjb, so Mlv represents Rjasthn merging into Bundl and Gujart. We may take the language of the Indore Agency of Central India as the standard form of the dialect, and the specimens given, on which the grammatical sketch which follows is based, come from the Junior Branch of the Dewas State in that area.
As stated above, Mlv, in the Malwa country, has two forms, viz.:-Rg (properly spelt Rg) or Rj-w, spoken by Rajputs, and Mlv (properly spelt Mlv), sometimes called Ahr, spoken by the rest of the population. There is not much difference between these two forms of speech. When they do differ, Rg shows a tendency to agree with the dialects of central Rajputana, Mrw (under the form of Mw) and Jaipur.